The Philadelphia Flyers face a significant decision in the upcoming offseason. Travis Konecny, their 27-year-old winger, becomes eligible for an extension starting July 1, which could potentially be substantial. Given the trend of players his age securing eight-year contracts, it’s likely he’ll seek a similar term.
However, regardless of the financial figures involved, the Flyers should exercise caution in committing to a long-term extension. Whether Konecny settles for a more team-friendly deal around $7 million or aims for the higher range of $8-9 million, the team should refrain from considering a lengthy contract. Unless they can negotiate a short-term agreement, offering him a substantial contract would be unwise. While Konecny currently contributes significantly to the team and is an exciting player, his future impact may not be guaranteed.
Konecny Is Only Valuable in Transition
Konecny’s primary strength lies in his ability to score during rapid offensive transitions, a skill that currently defines his value to the Flyers. His knack for swiftly driving towards the net and consistently beating goaltenders with his trademark low glove-side shot has made him a key asset. However, this reliance on rush scoring raises significant concerns about his future longevity and effectiveness on the ice.
When the Flyers endured a rough stretch under the demanding coaching style of John Tortorella, Konecny’s limitations became evident. His production significantly dropped during this period, highlighting his struggle to contribute when the team couldn’t generate opportunities on the rush. Despite his talent, Konecny failed to sustain his performance when faced with fatigue or defensive pressure.
This decline wasn’t unforeseeable, as throughout the season, Konecny’s scoring outside of fast breaks was notably scarce. A significant majority of his goals were scored during rush situations, indicating a potential vulnerability when the team couldn’t maintain a quick pace. Additionally, his limited success on the power play further underscored his dependence on transition opportunities.
Looking ahead, the concern grows as players typically lose their ability to dominate in rapid transitions as they age. Unlike elite forwards who possess diverse skills such as exceptional hockey IQ, playmaking abilities, or defensive prowess, Konecny lacks these alternative strengths. Should his speed diminish with time, his effectiveness on the ice could diminish considerably, mirroring the fate of players like Cam Atkinson.
Comparing Konecny to established veterans like Sidney Crosby, Brad Marchand, Claude Giroux, Mats Zuccarello, Anze Kopitar, and Joe Pavelski reveals a significant discrepancy in skill sets. While these players have excelled in various facets of the game throughout their careers, Konecny’s reliance on rush scoring stands out as his defining trait. This narrow skill set poses significant risks for a long-term contract extension, especially considering the lack of precedent for players of his type aging well in the NHL.
In essence, Konecny’s defensive deficiencies and heavy reliance on rush scoring highlight the precarious nature of committing to him for an extended period. Without a diversified skill set to fall back on, his future effectiveness on the ice remains uncertain, making an eight-year deal a risky proposition in today’s NHL landscape.
